PDF Ebook The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books
Locating the ideal The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books book as the right necessity is kind of good lucks to have. To begin your day or to end your day in the evening, this The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books will be proper sufficient. You can merely hunt for the ceramic tile right here and you will certainly obtain the book The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books referred. It will certainly not bother you to reduce your valuable time to go for purchasing book in store. By doing this, you will certainly additionally spend cash to spend for transport and other time spent.
The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books
PDF Ebook The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books
Exactly how an idea can be got? By looking at the superstars? By checking out the sea and also taking a look at the sea interweaves? Or by checking out a publication The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books Everybody will have particular characteristic to acquire the motivation. For you who are passing away of books as well as still get the inspirations from publications, it is truly wonderful to be right here. We will certainly reveal you hundreds compilations of guide The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books to review. If you like this The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books, you could additionally take it as your own.
Why should be The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books in this site? Get much more revenues as what we have informed you. You can discover the other relieves besides the previous one. Alleviate of getting guide The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books as exactly what you really want is likewise given. Why? We provide you many kinds of the books that will not make you feel weary. You could download them in the link that we offer. By downloading The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books, you have taken the right way to pick the convenience one, as compared to the inconvenience one.
The The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books oftens be wonderful reading book that is easy to understand. This is why this book The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books becomes a preferred book to read. Why don't you desire turned into one of them? You can delight in reviewing The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books while doing various other activities. The existence of the soft file of this book The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books is sort of getting experience quickly. It includes just how you must conserve guide The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books, not in racks naturally. You may save it in your computer system gadget and gizmo.
By saving The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books in the gadget, the method you read will certainly additionally be much easier. Open it and begin checking out The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books, simple. This is reason why we propose this The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books in soft file. It will not disrupt your time to get the book. On top of that, the online heating and cooling unit will additionally reduce you to look The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books it, also without going somewhere. If you have link net in your office, home, or device, you could download and install The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books it straight. You might not likewise wait to obtain the book The End Of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books to send out by the vendor in various other days.
In this successor to his critically acclaimed anthology, The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails, a former minister and now leading atheist spokesperson has assembled a stellar group of respected scholars to continue the critique of Christianity begun in the first volume. Contributors include Victor Stenger, Robert Price, Hector Avalos, Richard Carrier, Keith Parsons, David Eller, and Taner Edis.
Loftus is also the author of the best-selling Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity. Taken together, the Loftus trilogy poses formidable challenges to claims for the rationality of the Christian faith.
Anyone with an interest in the philosophy of religion will find this compilation to be intellectually stimulating and deeply thought provoking.
From the Trade Paperback edition.
- Sales Rank: #409353 in eBooks
- Published on: 2011-07-12
- Released on: 2011-07-12
- Format: Kindle eBook
Review
"This book is well worth reading. I am happy to endorse it. Initially, I was concerned that it was a rehash of other works or ideas but found it refreshingly informative and challenging. I am pretty well read and educated in the field and felt I was learning much of the time, or getting a new and interesting angle on an old idea. The creative ideas explored by the authors show how little Christianity has to offer our culture. Indeed, it is time for it to end." --Darrel W. Ray, Ed.D, an organizational psychologist and author of The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture (2009)
"No collection better demonstrates how taking Christianity seriously reveals its all too human origin. This superb, often witty, and exceedingly well-researched collection explains how early Christianity is only a pale resemblance of any of the diverse Christian sects today. As well, the authors reveal how vastly improbable Christian dogmas are: such as the notion that a god designed the universe; that life replete with personal identity continues after death; that hell represents divine justice; and the claim that morality is exclusively Christian. Overall, very sobering for Christians, and so wonderfully delightful for the rest of us." --Malcolm Murray, PhD., Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Prince Edward Island, and author of The Atheist's Primer
"Like everything else, religions evolve under pressure. The cultural environment for Christianity is currently as rigorous and demanding as ever. Perhaps the 'End of Christianity' should take the form of extinction, as this book's authors portend. At the very least Christianity's theological defense mechanisms are proven inadequate by the sharpest set of intellectual criticisms found under the cover of a single volume. The end of Christianity cannot be predicted, but it can be helped along by a careful reading of this tremendously useful book." --John Shook, PhD, Director of Education at the Center for Inquiry in Amherst, NY, and author of The God Debates: A 21st Century Guide (2010)
"Should Christianity end? I think not. But unthinking Christianity definitely should. For that reason I am grateful to the authors of this outstanding collection of essays." --Randal Rauser, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Historical Theology, Taylor Seminary, Edmonton, Canada, and author of the book You're Not As Crazy As I Think: Dialogue in a World of Loud Voices and Hardened Opinions (2011)
"The End of Christianity reads like a family reunion which brings together the family of disbelieving intellectuals that we've grown to love and respect. The stories that form the great narrative of the history of unbelief find in this book fresh voices with new and exciting angles. Loftus and his friends annihilate the Christian Goliath with their disputatious sling shots. The reader will probably hope that believers will not shy away from this text if only so that Loftus will soon publish yet another exciting anthology." --Johnnie Terry is an instructor in the Philosophy department at Sierra College, California, where he wrote and regularly teaches an Introduction to Atheism course.
"A blurb does not do this fascinating book justice with its beefy arguments as well as tasty tidbits of information all geared to show that when it comes to 'God talk' and the 'revealed religion' known as Christianity, the questions outnumber the certainties. And though Christianity and religion in general will certainly endure long enough for John Loftus to edit additional works, that sort of blessing does not appear to be one for which some Christians will be eager to thank God." --Edward T. Babinski, editor of Leaving the Fold: Testimonies of Former Fundamentalists, and author of the chapter, "The Cosmology of the Bible" in The Christian Delusion
"The Christian Delusion is the first book I give to anyone who wants to understand why I am no longer a Christian. Loftus and company have returned with The End of Christianity, which will now be the second book I give to anyone who wants to read a substantive case against Christian faith." --Luke Meuhlhauser of the popular blog Common Sense Atheism
About the Author
John W. Loftus (Angola, IN) earned M.A. and M.Div. degrees in theology and philosophy from Lincoln Christian Seminary under the guidance of Dr. James D. Strauss. He then attended Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, where he studied under Dr. William Lane Craig and received a Th.M. degree in philosophy of religion. Before leaving the church, he had ministries in Michigan, Illinois, and Indiana, and taught at several Christian and secular colleges. The author of Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity, and the editor of The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails, Loftus is the founder of the Debunking Christianity blog, found at debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com.
Most helpful customer reviews
66 of 75 people found the following review helpful.
Strongest entry yet from Loftus and company.
By Saganite
I was somewhat critical of the previous Loftus-edited collection of essays, The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails, mainly for its unevenness. I find "End" to be a more consistently excellent work, with several clear instances of lucid, original thinking, well-presented.
Carrier continues to distinguish himself in essays on intelligent design and non-relativistic morality (though I confess that I do not have the requisite training to understand fully the formal logic he employs in the morality essay), and Robert Price extends his tradition of advancing fresh ideas in punchy, accessible prose. Hector Avalos performs something of a miracle, making nearly as strong a case in his brief essay as he does in The End of Biblical Studies (though of course at great loss of the sort of supporting material a scholar would insist on reviewing before agreeing with his thesis).
Even Loftus, who I have not always accorded the highest respect, shines in his essays. I still think his "Outsider Test of Faith" has an "every problem looks like a nail/I have a hammer" quality to it, but I admit that he has demonstrated surprising versatility with this tool, and his prose continues to grow more acute and incisive, even as the language seems to flow better and better.
For those reasons and more, I hope that--despite this being termed the completion of a sort of "trilogy"--Loftus continues the good working of gathering interesting voices to criticize Christianity. Much of the literature coming out of New Atheism (and its relatives) comes from the sciences and philosophy), but while Carrier in particular touches on such issues, this is largely a work of theological and biblical criticism. As someone who himself deconverted mostly due to theological conflicts (my appreciation of science and atheistic philosophy came years later), I see a crucial place for this type of literature. In reading "End," I found it increasingly difficult to imagine any honest Christian engaging with the material and not coming away with serious doubts, if not outright skepticism regarding her faith.
90 of 105 people found the following review helpful.
Take the outsider test for faith, Read the book!
By Nicholas Ryan Covington
Loftus and his distinguished colleagues have managed to produce yet another excellent and invaluable addition to the debate over the truth of Christianity.
In the introduction John reviews his "outsider test for faith" and considers some objections. Nothing new here. People are still trying to avoid testing their worldview without there biases towards that worldview, and John rightly shows that this is nothing more than special pleading.
In chapter 1, "Christianity Evolving", Dr. David Eller treats us to a fascinating anthropological look at how Christianity, like a species that evolves and adapts to its in enviroment, has managed to blossom into a large family of peculiar sects.
In chapter 2, "Christianity's Success was not Incredible", Dr. Richard Carrier gives a capsule summary of his book Not the Impossible Faith and then discusses some reasons that the facts about the origin of Christianity demonstrate that Christianity is not true. That may sound like "the genetic fallacy" but it isn't: he's saying that the claims Christianity makes about the nature of the universe (that there is an all powerful God who sent his son to die and that everyone must believe this in order to recieve eternal life, and that God wants all men to be saved) entails with some probability that God would make that message known to everyone all over the world, and thus Native Americans and the Chinese and everyone else ought to have been visited by God and told the truth. In past debates Carrier has had, Christians have responded that we don't know that God would actually do something like this, and maybe there are good reasons he wouldn't. But in this new chapter, Carrier sets up his argument in such a way that this objection is irrelevant. It involves Bayes' Theorem, and while I can't explain that here (Carrier himself explains it in a later chapter) more or less Bayes' theorem entails that when theory A predicts a piece of evidence with greater probability than theory B, that piece of evidence increases the probability of theory A. So, theory A (that Christianity is false) predicts with basically 100 percent certainty that Jesus would NOT have travelled all over the world after his death and explained the gospel to the Native Americans, chinese, and so forth. Theory B (Christianity is true) does not predict this information with 100 percent (or nearly 100 percent) certainty because if Christianity is true then there is a valid and non-neglible chance that God something like that would happen. Since the falsity of Christianity better predicts that piece of evidence than the truth of Christianity, then this raises the overall probability that Christianity is false to some degree.
In chapter 3, "Christianity is Wildly Improbable" John Loftus reviews a laundry list of weird and unlikely (and perhaps impossible) beliefs that Christians must defend, and concludes that the combination of all this things together results in Christianity having a negligible chance of being true.
Chapter 4, "Why Biblical Studies Must End" presents a capsule summary of Hector Avalos' book The End of Biblical Studies which shows how the bible is irrelevant to modern life and is not really special in anyway except as a testament to what some people thought and believed in the ancient past.
In chapter 5, "Can God Exist if Yahweh Doesn't?" Dr. Jaco Gericke takes a bottom-up approach to disproving the existence of God. I call it "bottom-up" because I would describe the arguments of most other atheists as being "top-down": that is, they argue that the God of the bible can't exist because the God of the philosophers does not. Gericke, on the other hand, argues that the concept of God that Christian philosophers hold to cannot exist because not only are these two not the same thing, but more importantly because the biblical God is an absurdity. The Old Testament God is just an ancient Hebrew Superman. While any of the passages that indicate this (that God was thought of as having a body, for example) might be disputed or interpreted differently, the cumulative case brought forth by so many passages argues that the god being described by the Old Testament very probably was an ancient Hebrew superman. In chapter 6 Valerie Tarico adds further weight to this case by arguing that an all-powerful and immaterial being like God would not, and could not, have emotions like anger, which the Biblical God is said to have had. This is because emotions serve a function that is only necessary in limited creatures like humans. For example, anger is there to allow you to prepare for situations of conflict, because in a situation of conflict you need to be more aggressive and alert, lest you lose the fight. All of that is obviously advantageous in evolutionary terms. But a God wouldn't really need any emotions. After all, how could an all-powerful being need to become more alert or more aggressive to ensure that it didn't "lose the fight" against some other entity? Though many might describe those passages on God's anger as metaphorical, that is not the most obvious or plain meaning of the text. I recall reading a story in the OT (Blast that I cannot remember the passage now) in which God had to keep a distance between himself and his people because God thought that if he dwelt among the people he might lose control of himself and lash out and kill them. I must find this passage, but in the meantime, suffice to say that if such a passage exists it supports the views of Tarico and Gericke and shows that the biblical God is an absurdity.
In chapter 7, "The Absurdity of the atonement" Dr. Ken Pulliam fully demonstrates that the evangelical theory of Jesus' death (that Jesus' death occurred as a substitute for our suffering for our sins) is indefensible. The knockout comes on page 185: "If man knows right from wrong as a a result of being made in the image of God, and if one of the things man knows from his being so created is that it is wrong to punish the innocent, then how can the central doctrine of Evangelical Christianity, namely penal substitution, be maintained?"
Matt McCormick argues in chapter 8 that there is more and better quality evidence for witchcraft going on in 18th century Salem, Massachusetts than there is for the resurrection of Jesus. This means that accepting Christianity means accepting that witchcraft also occurred in Salem. But adopting that position is obviously absurd and problematic. One point that I wish Matt had brought out is that if one adopted an epistemic standard that was so low that it allowed the acceptance of the Salem witchcraft, as well as the many millions of other miracle claims, then such a position would mean that the resurrection offered only negligible support for Christianity. Think about it: if you are a Christian who accepts the claims of witchcraft and the miracle claims of other religions, you would have to adopt the position that some of these miracles were worked by demons or were worked by your God and the people witnessing the miracle did not realize. But then who's to say the miracle of the resurrection wasn't performed by a demon or by someone else's God?
In chapter 9 Bob Price offers a list of natural explanations for the gospel material on the resurrection, assuming that the gospel accounts themselves are basically correct, and he defends these as plausible. I agree, but incidentally I don't think anyone needs to concede that the material in the is that reliable.
Chapter 10 is a discussion of how the doctrine of Hell is a damnable and indefensible doctrine. Excellent material, and good food for thought: how can anyone be a Christian (or at least, an evangelical Christian) if it means defending a demonstrably immoral doctrine?
The remaining chapters I have no comment on, except for Richard Carrier's two excellent chapters. One is on whether the universe is intelligently-designed, and while I'm in agreement, I am not completely sure if his refutations of the fine-tuning aregument are totally sound.
Overall, this is an excellent book, and every open minded Christian ought to have a copy on their bookshelf right next to The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails. I doubt that any rational person could remain a Christian after being informed of the arguments in these two books. At least, I can't imagine and have never seen a reasonable response to the points in these books. Highly recommended.
78 of 94 people found the following review helpful.
The Final Nail in Christianity's Coffin
By Matt DeStefano
I recently received John Loftus' The End of Christianity, an anthology of some of the most profound atheist writers that delivers a variety of convincing arguments for the abandonment of the Christian faith. In lieu of new content, I decided to go ahead and write up a detailed review for his book. There are 14 chapters, and while I want to avoid summarizing each and every one of them I'd like to call attention to what I feel are some of the more noteworthy arguments.
The first chapter is written by Dr. David Eller and titled Christianity Evolving: On the Origin of the Christian Species. It is an informative and compelling piece that focuses on the evolution of Christian theology. It shows that the view that Christianity has "stood the test of time" is completely debunked in virtue of Christianity's ever-evolving body of beliefs. It includes an especially intriguing section titled The Invention of Traditions in which Eller explores the idea of building up theological tradition to deal with the acquisition of new evidence, even when the evidence conflicts with the tradition they are trying to assimilate with. Eller continues to argue that Christianity is not a singular term that refers to a stagnate and unified tradition, but instead is a multitude of targets that are constantly being realigned and reinterpreted by Christians who do not wish to see their faith inundated by newer evidence. It seems that Eller's argument resounds with a theme that many atheist authors (myself included) have been continuing to insist upon, and that is the destruction of the religious landscape. That merely accumulating new evidence will not be the final blow to Christianity, that we will have to continue to vigilantly stamp out the religious apologists' special pleading and ever-moving target for the debunking of their personal brand of religious faith.
In chapter 3, Loftus adds his own material in a chapter entitled Christianity is Wildly Improbable. He sets out a litany of claims derived from Christian creeds and argues that the more of these that Christians accept, the less tenable their faith becomes. Although it is only a minor and passing argument in the chapter, I found Loftus' analysis of a spiritual being creating a material being intriguing. Essentially, Loftus is using the arguments leveled at Cartesian dualism and re-tooling them as an argument against the creation of a material universe by a spirtual God. Loftus questions "How does something that is spirit create something material, or interact with it, unless there is some point of contact between them that they both share?" This same reasoning was the beginning of the end for Cartesian dualism, and if this argument was to be expounded upon I think it's consequences for theism could be equally devastating. Loftus also argues that scholars who are otherwise intelligent often look ridiculous when defending the faith, and analyzes arguments presented by major Christian scholars (Platinga, Craig, etc.) and points out their religious special pleading that often goes unnoticed.
In Chapter 6, Dr. Valerie Tarico examines the concept of emotions in relation to the Christian God. I haven't read any of Dr. Tarico's work before, but this was one of my favorite chapters in the book. In a likeable and humorous voice, Dr. Tarico examines God's various emotional reactions through out the Old Testament, using modern psychological analysis in order to demonstrate how unbelievably human God is at regulating His own emotions. She examines the idea of anthropomorphism and asks engaging questions about how we can tell the difference between which concepts of God are "something outside of us" versus "projections of our psyches". Drawing off of psychological and physiological research, Tarico argues that emotions are intricate and complex systems existing in our physical body, and then wonders how the authors of the Bible could possibly ascribe these attributes to an immaterial God.
In Chapter 8, Dr. Matt McCormick (a professor of mine, actually) argues against the historical case for the resurrection by using an analogous case of the Salem Witch Trials. After charitably summarizing the historical case for the resurrection (using Habermas, Wright, etc.), Dr. McCormick argues that we have more evidence (more quantity and better quality) of the Salem Witch Trials than we do for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. This again reiterates the fallacy of special pleading. Unless Christians want to accept that there was indeed witchcraft in Salem (as one of his debate opponents has in the past), it seems that Christians ought to reject the resurrection for the same reasons they reject the Salem Witch Trials.
In chapter 13, Dr. Victor J. Stenger analyzes the evidence for life after death and especially examines the use of NDE (Near Death Experiences) in attempts to prove the existence of an immaterial soul, or consciousness existing after death. He uncovers the lack of objective historical data and makes a compelling case to dismiss anecdotal evidence in favor of controlled, recordable experiments. He also questions the consequences for believing in `cosmic justices' and makes the case that those who do believe it in have less vested interest in seeking justice here on Earth, and turns the table on many apologists who sing the praises of everyone "getting what they deserve" (in chapter 10, Dr. Keith Parsons provides an examination of Hell, which he calls "Christianity's Most Damnable Doctrine").
This book is an absolutely fascinating read and well worth your money to pick up a copy. I didn't include many of the brilliant articles in the book written by other thinkers like Dr. Hector Avalas, Dr. Richard Carrier, and Dr. Jaco Gericke. If you are a believer, this book contains many questions that ought to give you considerable pause, and if you are an atheist or skeptic, this book is likely to put the nail in Christianity's coffin.
The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books PDF
The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books EPub
The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books Doc
The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books iBooks
The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books rtf
The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books Mobipocket
The End of ChristianityFrom Prometheus Books Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar